□
Japanese
ODA and Reform |
□
Int'l
Development Strategies, Aid Partnerships |
□
African
Growth Initiative |
□
Policy
Dialogue on Industrial Development in Ethiopia |
□
Vietnam
Development Forum |
□
GRIPS
Global COE Program |
□
Aid
and Development Management in East Asia |
□
21st
Century COE Program |
Aid and Development Management in East Asia |
Managing the Development Process and
Aid: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Final
report has been issued -- GRIPS Development Forum conducted research from July 2005 to March 2007, focusing on Thailand, Malaysia and the Philippines to examine their experiences in managing the development process and aid. Through analysis, we endeavored to draw implications for the institution building and capacity development efforts by developing countries. We conducted the analysis from developing countries’ perspectives and to come up with some concrete policy proposals that would serve as useful references for today’s developing countries including Vietnam. At the same time, we attempted to draw some policy recommendations to donors aiming for enhanced aid effectiveness. ObjectivesThe proposed study aims to examine the experiences of East Asian countries in managing the development process and aid, and to draw implications for the institution building efforts by today’s development countries. The study will focus on Thailand and Malaysia, mainly in the 70s and the 80s when the current development administration system was formulated and enhanced. It will also include the analysis of the Philippines after 1986 when democratization and decentralization initiatives moved into high gear. To this end, the study will examine the role and actual functions of central economic agencies in the process of development planning, budget planning and execution, planning and implementation of priority projects or programs (including aid-financed activities), as well as its coordination mechanisms with relevant ministries. We try to analyze not only the institutional settings of development administration but also the actual coordination features to further understand how development plans were brought to realization maintaining coherence among development priorities, budgeting, public investment planning and aid management. We also attempt to look into some critical factors that affected these actual coordination features. (In this respect, we conduct concrete case analysis of the Eastern Seaboard Development experiences in Thailand.) We attempt to make analysis from developing countries’ perspectives and to draw lessons for the current global development debates especially capacity development and aid effectiveness issues. Schedule and Output
Utilization and Dissemination Strategy
<Seminars and workshops (updates & plans, documents distributed)>
|
Dates | Venue | Presenters | Documents |
June
13, 2006 (feedback from interested parties in Vietnam) |
VDF (Vietnam) |
Izumi Ohno Masumi Shimamura |
1.
Slide 1 (pdf
file.63KB) 2. Slide 2 (pdf file.50KB) 3. Handout (pdf file.61KB) 4. Short minutes (VDF website) |
July 31, 2006 (feedbacks from interested parties in Kenya) |
Regional Support Office for Eastern and Southern Africa/JICA Kenya Office | Izumi Ohno |
1.Slide
(pdf file, 60KB) 2.Handout (pdf file, 84KB) 3.Minutes (pdf file, 24KB) |
November 8, 2006
By invitation only (feedbacks in Tokyo) Feedback
seminar: |
GRIPS |
Izumi Ohno Masumi Shimamura Panelists: |
1.
Program (32KB) 2. Izumi Ohno (64KB) 3. Masumi Shimamura (123KB) 4. Overview report (206KB) <Panelists> 5. Mr. Bhandhugravi Nophadol (handout) (351KB) 6. Mr. Jegasothy Jegathesan 7. Mr. Takeo Matsuzawa (8KB) 8. Minutes (Same as Policy Minutes No. 21, pdf file, 3.8MB) |
November 9, 2006 <Special session> By invitation only
Seminar on FDI promotion in African
countries: |
GRIPS |
Mr. J. Jegathesan
Commentator: |
1.
Program (29KB) 2. Mr. Jegasothy Jegathesan (2.3MB) <Panelists> 3. Mr. Aiichiro Yamamoto (8KB)
4.
Minutes (Same as
Policy |
Copyright (c) 2009 GRIPS Development
Forum.
All rights reserved. |